Thursday, September 30, 2004

Sleep

One of these days, I'm going to get some.  A hail of presentations to customers and VPs has kept me from sleeping well, and I seem to have lost the ability to make the 5 a.m. getup to work out.  It seems like both Darlene and I have been dragging ass all week. 

I think part of my problem is not being able to run, so I'm not as tired as I have been.  Couple that with the phenomenon that I seem to get depressed and drink more when I'm injured and can't train, seems like a good recipe for not sleeping.  So, the plan is to cut out the beer, start getting up regularly in the mornings to get back into a semi-normal sleeping pattern.  The short term fix is to get to bed early and pop one of Darlene's famous sleeping pills to kick-start the night.

I also read this morning that Merck is pulling Vioxx from the shelves because of the increased risk of heart attack and stroke.  I just got samples for Vioxx from the doc for my knee and should be taking those for a while.  The good news is that the studies that condemned the stuff showed no adverse effects in the first 18 months, so I should be able to weather it without any problems.  Hopefully the physical therapy will get me away from the need for more.

Shannon

We were able to get together with Shannon last night for dinner.  We met at PF Chang's and then dropped by our place so she could see the house.  Great to see her again; she looks great and seems very happy.  It sounds like everyone is doing well and sounds like Matt had his hands full with retiling the bathroom.  From what I saw when they tiled our place, he's a real trooper to tackle it on his own.  Hope it turns out well.

She was headed out to meet everyone downtown so I hope 6th Street wasn't as disappointing as the night before.  I think Wednesday nights are actually a decent night down there because of all the UT kids nearby.  Sounds like she'll be back in town in November, so hopefully we'll be able to get together again and we will be able to go out with them.  Unfortunately I forgot to take her picture, so nothing to post.

The economics are staggering

Is Three the New Two? Adding Up
The Cost of Having a Third Child

By HILARY STOUT
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
September 30, 2004; Page D1

There is a question that most people with two children eventually contemplate, even if it is only for a fleeting moment: What about a third?

For some, it is a prospect that can be dismissed with a horrified chuckle. But there are signs that more people are deciding to take the plunge. The National Center for Health Statistics shows a modest uptick -- 28% of all births in 2002 were to mothers who already had at least two children, up from 26% in 1996 and 25% in 1984. And some obstetricians say they are noticing an increase in third pregnancies, particularly among affluent women.

"Three is happening more frequently," says Laura Riley, an obstetrician with a private practice in Boston who heads the obstetrics group of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. It's even becoming a joke among some coteries of stroller-pushing moms that "three is the new two."

A confluence of factors appears to be making three more attractive. Advances in fertility treatments mean women can consider a third child well into their 40s, when careers and family finances may seem more secure. (The technology has also led to a surge in multiple births.) The increase in the percentage of mothers staying at home means more women are devoting full-time energy to their kids and may be more interested in having bigger families. Caring for three kids is becoming more manageable for working women, too, as more employers allow flex time and other "family-friendly" policies. And as the economy shows signs of strengthening, having a third child may become a viable option for even more couples.

But no matter how favorable the circumstances, the question of whether to go for three is tough. It isn't just the obvious factors, like a third college tuition to worry about and the fact that the kids will outnumber the adults. Having three kids imposes a number of hidden expenses and logistical challenges, from reshuffling bedrooms to paying for an extra taxi. Just as the world is set up for right-handers, it turns out it is also made for families no larger than four.

To start with, it helps to have an idea of how much more it's really going to cost. Babycenter.com has a calculator that could help you figure this out. Using research from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, it estimates that a child born in 2005 to two parents who live in the Midwest, have an annual income of more than $64,000, and plan to send the kid to a public college will cost $583,924 from birth through age 22. If that same family lives in the Northeast and hopes to send the child to a private college, the tab jumps to $815,370.

Todd Minear, a certified financial planner in Gladstone, Mo., set out to answer the cost question for himself as he and his wife consider having a third child. Child care in the preschool years is the big expense they worry about. Currently, the Minears pay $310 per week for day care for their three-year-old and one-year-old. A new baby would mean "five more years of day care than we bargained for," Mr. Minear says. The marginal difference, he calculates, is an extra $40,000.

Last weekend, the Minears went house-hunting, since their current home has three bedrooms. Trading up will cost an extra $30,000 to $50,000 where they live, Mr. Minear says. (Of course two of the kids could share, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Sharing a room can make kids closer, psychologists say.)

The bank account isn't the only thing to think about. Consider the logistical problems with restaurants. When you become a family of five, you become a large party. Just two of the 21 tables and booths at a Denny's in South Burlington, Vt., accommodate more than four people. Across town at Burger King -- a joint so family-friendly it has a playground inside -- only one of the 30-plus tables has more than four places.

In New York City, taxis allow only four passengers, so a bigger family has to spring for two separate cabs. But that doesn't mean people who live elsewhere are off the hook: There is no way three kids' car seats fit across the back seat of most cars, so grown men who vowed they would never let go of their convertibles find themselves trading in for minivans.

Travel, always a challenge with kids, gets exponentially harder with a third. Try to book a "family suite" with more than four people at The Bellmoor in Rehoboth Beach, Del., and you're out of luck. No more than four allowed -- not even if the fifth is a baby. So instead of paying $400-plus per night for the two-room suite, you are forced to book two adjoining "deluxe rooms," at a cost of more than $700.

Then there are the little things you'd never think about. Tom Donahue, a father of three in suburban Atlanta, went to a fair with his family recently. Since the cars on most of the rides were just big enough for two kids, one of the adults had to squeeze into a second car to keep the third child company.

I write on all this from experience. Almost two years ago, my husband and I welcomed our third child into the world -- little Johnny, with spiky red hair, who joined his 4½-year-old sister and 2-year-old brother in our Manhattan apartment. At first, it was pretty easy. The third time around in babydom, you actually feel like you know what you're doing.

Once he started walking, it got more complicated. Now, as I turn to answer a question from Clare, who is doing her first-grade homework, Johnny darts away and climbs into the bathroom sink. Meanwhile, Michael is loudly demanding assistance in locating his stuffed lion. The stress of getting everyone out the door makes for more family bickering then we otherwise would have had. And with each new child, it gets harder to stay at the office (though more financially necessary to do so).

But there are few things more heartwarming than watching the three siblings play together. And life wouldn't be nearly as rich without John.

E-mail me at familymatters@wsj.com1.

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109650668134632150,00.html

Tuesday, September 28, 2004


this is the picture to go along with the story below... Posted by Hello

Now, that's not something that happens all the time...

Unfortunate Whale Speared by Cruise Ship
OTTAWA (Reuters) - It wasn't until the U.S. cruise ship had pulled into port in Atlantic Canada that those on board made a gruesome discovery -- the body of a large whale was impaled on the vessel's bow.

Officials said on Monday that the 60-foot finback whale could have been stuck there for up to two days before "Jewel of the Seas" docked in Saint John, New Brunswick, on Sunday, after a cruise through waters where the giant mammals abound.

"The captain of the vessel was not aware there was a whale basically impaled on the bow ... this is an extremely unusual case," said Wendy Williams, a spokeswoman for Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Coast Guard officials quickly removed the body of the whale and towed it out to sea. The Royal Caribbean ship had been cruising the St. Lawrence river and the Bay of Fundy on the Atlantic coast, an area rich in whales.

Shipping routes through the Bay of Fundy were changed last year to protect the rare right whale. Finback whales are relatively common.

"This is the first ship strike (on a whale) that I'm aware of in the past year," said Williams.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=573&u=/nm/whale_dc&printer=1

Dinner with Shannon

Shannon is in town tonight and tomorrow night.  I've traded phone messages with her and it looks like we'll get together for dinner tomorrow night at PF Chang's and maybe swing by the house since she didn't get to see it last time.  It will be good to see her again, but that means we have to pick up the house…  That's a good thing though, just don't know where we are going to get the time.

Knee

Had some problems with the knee during Sunday's run.  I got about two miles into it before the tendon on the outside of my left knee got too painful to continue.  It was more pronounced going up and down hill.  I walked back and iced on and off for the rest of the day. 

I just got back from an appointment with Dr. Elenz at Austin Sports Medicine and he said it was inflammation of my IT band from rubbing over one of the bony protrusions on the outside of the knee (can't remember what he called it).  He thought my hips might be a little weak laterally because swimming, biking, running, squats, etc. are all straightforward motions and this might be causing a problem.  He gave me enough Vioxx to poison a horse and a prescription for four weeks of physical therapy to work on strengthening the hips and stretching the ITB.  I will also have my massage therapist focus on my ITBs when I see her.

The doc thought I was okay continuing to swim and lift, and he thought biking was okay as long as it didn't hurt (it didn't on Saturday's 50-miler) and I didn't push big gears.  So I guess I will continue with the really big swim and bike weeks at low intensity to build as much base as possible.  The physical therapist will be able to tell me when I can restart running when I see him or her next Friday.  So it looks like I'm back out again for a while and will have a slow ramp once I do come back.

Saturday, September 25, 2004

About time

California Bans Kids from Tanning Salons

Fri Sep 24, 8:05 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California's perpetually buff Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (news - web sites) signed a bill on Friday barring children under 14 from going to tanning salons in his sunshine-filled state.

California lawmakers backed the legislation in May citing concerns by dermatologists who blame the artificial light in tanning booths for contributing to a rise in skin cancer.

Violators could be liable for a fine of up to $2,500. Teenagers between the age of 14 and 18 need a note from their parents to go to a tanning salon.

Friday, September 24, 2004

A tinge of truth, but obviously a little extreme


TRIUMPH OF THE STULTOCRACY
By Ted Rall
NEW YORK--"Kerry doesn't know what the working-class people do; he hasn't done any physical labor all his life," Sharon Alfman, a 51-year-old cook in New Lexington, Ohio, told a New York Times reporter. It's true. Kerry is a rich boy. But then she added: "Bush's values are middle-class family values."

George W. Bush earned $727,000 last year. Estimates of his net worth range between $9 and $26 million. Middle class he most assuredly is not. Working class he never has been. Like fellow Skull and Bones member John Kerry (news - web sites), man of the people he never will be. But it matters that Sharon Altman thinks he is. Unless you too are a voter living in a swing state like Ohio, her vote counts more than yours.

Demonstrating that stupefying ignorance can be bipartisan, another Ohioan interviewed for the same article said she is against the war in Iraq (news - web sites) because, like 42 percent of her fellow Americans, she thinks Iraq was behind 9/11: "We shouldn't be over there building them back up because they didn't build our towers back up." She is wrong on so many levels that it makes my brain hurt.

Both women are entitled to their unawareness. We can't pass a law to force them to read the paper. But neither of these people ought to force their fellow citizens to suffer the consequences of their being so uninformed. Voting should be a privilege earned by an intellectually engaged citizen, not a right given to any adult with a pulse.

All men are created equal, declared the Founders. But as Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in "Democracy in America," universal suffrage counts upon the existence of a responsible, well-educated citizenry in order to result in political equality. If you give the vote to morons, you get the "tyranny of the masses"--a lumpen proletariat prone to manipulation by demagogues and fools--such as that which created chaos and bloodshed in post-revolutionary France. We're all equal at birth, but what we do later determines whether or not our opinions are worthwhile.

At this writing, the world's greatest nation flails under the rule of buffoons and madmen, bogged down in two optional wars we're actually losing. The world's richest economy is shedding jobs, running up debts and building nothing for the future. Voters, offered an election year alternative to the subliterate idiot who single-handedly created this mess, spurn him for a leader even dumber than they are. America has become a stultocracy: government by morons, for morons.

A 2002 poll found that 64 percent of Americans--people whose votes help determine how much you pay in taxes--could not name a single Supreme Court justice. In 2003, 58 percent--people whose votes could elect someone who starts a nuclear war--couldn't identify a single department of the president's cabinet. Voters aged 18 to 24, whose recent schooling ought to inspire confidence in their knowledge of basic facts, are especially ignorant. National Geographic (news - web sites) says that 85 percent of young American adults can't find Afghanistan (news - web sites), Iraq or Israel on a map.

The fact that these yahoos are allowed to vote is an abomination. Their ill-considered ballots cancel or dilute those cast by those who do the heavy lifting that makes them good citizens: keeping abreast of current events, researching issues, studying candidates' positions.

In the Old South, literacy tests were used to disenfranchise blacks. Alternatively, a basic political literacy test should be used to ensure that anyone who picks ESPN over CNN--regardless of race or creed--stays home on Election Day. Prospective voters should be required to answer at least three of the following questions correctly; to give people a fair shot, the test should be published in newspapers a week before an election:

1. Who is the vice president?
2. What is your state capital?
3. Name one of the following: your governor, congressman or one senator.
4. What is the capital of the United States?
5. Name one federal cabinet-level department.
Of course, such a political literacy test would drastically reduce voter turnout. On the other hand, those who pass could take comfort in knowing that they're not competing against the 60 percent of Americans who think we've found Iraq's imaginary WMDs, or the 22 percent who "believe" that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) used such weapons against U.S. troops during the 2003 invasion.

I just can't see this taking root in our house...

Couture Decor
Hats, Purses, Kimonos Hang
As Art On Collectors' Walls;
The Bowling Shirt Problem

By LAUREN LIPTON
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
September 24, 2004; Page W10

Art consultant Barbara Guggenheim, who regularly brokers sales of million-dollar paintings, could display pretty much anything she wanted on the walls of her homes. But, there isn't much fine art in her Paris-area pied-à-terre. Instead, she says, "I have this other passion." One hallway is lined with floor-to-ceiling framed vintage handkerchiefs. In a guest room, a sculpture is an antique mannequin pinned with rhinestone brooches. A bathroom boasts still more hankies -- all with a poodle theme. "My husband won't even go in there," she says.

Now appearing alongside the Picasso: your purse. With vintage fashion becoming an increasingly popular -- and pricey -- collectible, more people are taking wearable items out of mothballs and into the living room to show off as art. Popular display items include kimonos, cowboy boots, military attire, celebrity costumes and designer-label accessories -- anything collectors deem colorful or visually interesting. Even some closets are getting the museum treatment, with backlit, glass-fronted cabinets that set off each Hermes handbag like a priceless Grecian urn.

Collectors call their fashion installations a way to showcase their personal style -- and a home décor unlikely to be duplicated anywhere else. They say period clothing, shoes and hats make great display pieces because they're bright and colorful, with a level of craftsmanship and detail that's rare today. Besides, with prices like these, collectors say, it makes little sense to pack this stuff away. Sales of vintage clothing and accessories are up 80% since 1999 at auction house Doyle New York; the average lot price grew from $542 to $1,187 during the same period. And while prices in the vintage clothing field first started taking off for kimonos and Elvis jumpsuits, in recent years designer couture and accessories have been popular collectibles.

Accessible Art
For some homeowners, the appeal of couture and clothing as art is its accessibility. While a piece of fine art can be off-putting, everybody can relate to a shoe or a jacket, says Eric Lysdahl, an interior designer in New York. Fashion pieces are tactile, sculptural and three-dimensional -- and not that hard to interpret. "There's a comfort level," he says.

But for many, another appeal of vintage fashion -- Princess Diana's party dresses aside -- is that it doesn't have to cost a fortune. Period handkerchiefs can be had for a few dollars; old boots can go for around $125. At any given time on eBay, there are about 57,000 vintage fashion items for sale.

Collector Chryse Paul says she just wants a great conversation piece. The Monticello, Minn., photographer last week bought five outfits at a Sotheby's auction of the estate of Johnny and June Carter Cash, including a $2,400 rose-colored suede tunic and skirt with Native American-style beading that Mrs. Cash wore for a 1982 appearance at the Tennessee State Fairgrounds. When she's not wearing them, Ms. Paul plans to display her new clothes on antique mannequins. "They won't be stuck in a closet," she says.

Still, having several hundred Bakelite bracelets or dress forms in Edwardian costume can be a bit off-putting to guests. Daryl Chen, a New York editor, displays over 100 handbags -- including one that's made out of kangaroo fur and plays "Waltzing Matilda" -- on shelves in her living room. "It's a good litmus test," she says. If first-time visitors "don't ask those obligatory, how-many-do-you-have, do-you-use-them questions, I know they're not my people."

Some fashionistas keep their collections in their closets, but that doesn't mean the clothing is not on display. Austin, Texas, architect Bob Wetmore says his firm, Cornerstone Group Architects, works on 50 homes a year with closets that have gallery-like details such as humidity control, ventilation, and glass-and-mahogany cabinets. (There was virtually no demand a decade ago.) One client has a special place to showcase a pair of go-go boots; another, Austin homeowner Jeanne Parker, has glass-fronted cases that house her ball gowns, fur coats and shoes. "It kind of looks like a library," she says.

Outside a museum, though, displaying fashion objects can be risky. One danger: The living room goes out of fashion. Some collectors say they quickly grow tired of their displays and then have to stuff them back in the closet.

In Mothballs
Then there's the matter of taking care of the clothes. The Costume Institute at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York fields at least three calls a day from people with conservation questions, says a spokeswoman, up from "sporadic" calls a few years ago. Old fabric is notoriously fragile, and experts say hanging old garments on a mannequin or on the wall can further stress the fabric, causing rips. Leather goods can dry out and crack in a hot room. Then there's the mothball problem. "Nothing's worse than smelling a dress that's been sitting in a box of mothballs for 40 years," says Kristi Paras, co-owner of Zachary's Smile, a New York vintage boutique.

R VanGorden Stedman pairs modern art with his collection of uniform jackets and dozens of pairs of Vans skateboard shoes (they line the baseboard in his Tampa, Fla., home). But he's learned the hard way that you can't display vintage clothing and accessories everywhere. His bowling shirts used to hang in his sunny laundry room, until they started to fade. He sold them for half of what he could have gotten, had they been in mint condition, he says.

Still, he's not parting with the 1950s oversize Wrangler rodeo-clown jeans that are laid out across a bookshelf -- even if they do get in the way. "They cover up part of my reference library," he says. "I have to put the pants on top of my head to peer underneath."

--Amir Efrati contributed to this article.

Write to Lauren Lipton at lauren.lipton@wsj.com

Thursday, September 23, 2004

Still not out of the woods


Tyler Hamilton Cleared to Keep Olympic Gold - IOC
By Justin Palmer
LONDON (Reuters) - Olympic time trial champion Tyler Hamilton has been cleared of any doping offence at the Athens Olympics, the International Olympic Committee (news - web sites) (IOC (news - web sites)) said on Thursday.

American Hamilton had been told that he gave a positive test for a blood transfusion in Athens on August 18 but the IOC said in a statement that the result of the B, or second, test was "non-conclusive" because the sample had been destroyed by being deep-frozen.

"The disciplinary procedure has had to be stopped because of the non-conclusive result," the statement said.
"The IOC will not be pursuing sanctions regarding this matter."
Hamilton still faces possible sanctions from cycling's ruling body, the UCI, after he was told he gave a positive test for a blood transfusion following his time trial victory during this month's Tour of Spain. The UCI is yet to officially comment.

Arnie Ljungqvist, head of the IOC's medical commission, told reporters that it had been a mistake to deep-freeze Hamilton's B sample from Athens.

"The blood sample was unfortunately destroyed. It should not have been deep frozen (in the laboratory)," he said in a teleconference.

HUMAN ERROR
"It was human error, caused by the unusual workload that prevailed during the Olympics... because there were three new tests introduced for the Athens Games and because the number of overall samples during the Olympic period was increased by 50 percent.

"Here we have a case where the A sample was deemed clearly positive by a panel of outside experts and was also agreed upon by the chief of the laboratory in Athens.

"But then we have the B analysis... the rules are clear, legally such a case will be deemed negative because the A (test) did not confirm the B."

The rider had faced losing his gold medal if his B test at the Olympics had been positive.
Hamilton, 33, withdrew from the Tour of Spain on Friday citing a stomach upset. He was suspended on Wednesday by his Phonak team, who said in a statement on Thursday that Hamilton's Tour of Spain B test was positive.

The American has maintained he is "100 percent innocent," while Phonak said he would remain with the team until "clarity" was achieved. Phonak also plan to set up a "scientific board" to check the reliability of the test method.

Hamilton could be banned for two years, effectively ending his career, if the UCI officially declares that he is guilty of doping offences in the Tour of Spain. If found guilty he would be the first athlete to be caught having a blood transfusion.

Hamilton finished fourth in the 2003 Tour de France despite breaking his collar bone in a crash at the end of the first stage. He used to support Lance Armstrong on the U.S. Postal team before leaving in 2001 to become team leader with CSC Tiscali.

Tuesday, September 21, 2004

Interesting since these tests are new...

'I'm 100 Percent Innocent', Says Hamilton
By Mark Ledsom
ZURICH (Reuters) - Olympic champion Tyler Hamilton said on Tuesday he was "100 percent innocent" as the Phonak rider responded to testing positive for blood transfusions.

"I'm devastated to be here tonight. My family, team, friends are all devastated and one thing I can guarantee you is I'm 100 percent innocent," the American told reporters at a news conference held by his Phonak cycling team.

"I've been accused of taking blood from another person. Anyone who knows me knows that is completely impossible.
"I can tell you what I did and did not put into my body. Cycling is very important to me but not that important. If I ever had to do that (doping) I'd hang the bike on the rack."

Hamilton said he was informed by the International Cycling Union (UCI) last Thursday that he had tested positive at the Tour of Spain for having a blood transfusion.

The 33-year-old was told on Saturday by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) that he had also tested positive for having a blood transfusion at last month's Athens Games.

"The two tests are alleged to show a similar method of doping," Hamilton said at a news conference.
If found guilty Hamilton would be the first athlete caught for a blood transfusion.
Hamilton won the Olympic time trial gold medal and the eighth stage of the Tour of Spain -- a time trial -- on September 11. He withdrew from the Vuelta on Friday citing an upset stomach.

"I can guarantee you the (Olympic) gold medal will be staying in my living room until I don't have a cent left," said Hamilton. "I've worked hard for it and it's not going anywhere."

PROBABILITY TEST
Blood transfusions are believed to have been widely used in cycling but there has, until now, been no way to detect them.

New tests are thought to have been introduced for the Tour de France but asked to confirm the timing a UCI spokesman said: "We are refusing to comment on this."

Phonak chief executive officer Andreas Rihs, casting doubt on the reliability of the tests, said the team would stand behind Hamilton even if the 'B' tests were positive.

"We don't fire innocent people and if the 'B' test is positive as well we'll still stand behind Tyler. We believe Tyler independent of these results.

"We don't believe the test is reliable. It's more of a probability test. We have scientific papers that question the reliability of these tests.

"We think this test (at the Tour of Spain), or the IOC test at least, were done sloppily. The IOC test is suspect because it (the result) came out one month after it was done."

Hamilton finished fourth in the 2003 Tour de France despite breaking his collar bone in a crash at the end of the first stage. He used to support Lance Armstrong on the U.S. Postal team before leaving in 2001 to become team leader with CSC Tiscali.

Swiss cyclist Oscar Camenzind, who raced for Phonak, was banned for two years after testing positive for EPO shortly before the Athens Games. Camenzind was the 1998 world road race champion and he retired after the positive test was revealed.

Monday, September 20, 2004

hurts so good

Think Wasabi Clears Your Sinuses? Think Again

Mon Sep 20, 1:32

By Alison McCook

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Many people believe the sushi-seasoner wasabi clears their sinuses, but new research presented this week suggests that the spicy green paste may do the opposite.

U.S. researchers found that eating wasabi appeared to increase congestion in a small group of healthy volunteers, despite the fact that participants said they thought that the spice had cleared their nasal passages.

"Actually, wasabi is a congestant," study author Dr. David S. Cameron told Reuters Health. "It makes the space of your nasal passages smaller, but it makes you feel more open."

Cameron explained that wasabi probably clogs up sinuses by increasing blood flow to the lining of the nose. That extra blood takes up space, he said, which constricts the nasal passageway.

Wasabi may make the nose feel more open, Cameron noted, by causing changes that increase the cooling effect of air breathed through the nose, or by stimulating flaring of the nostrils, which enables air to flow more easily though the nose.

Cameron and his team will present their findings Tuesday during the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation annual meeting in New York City.

Wasabi is made by grinding the stems of the Wasabia japonica plant into a paste. This plant belongs to the same family of plants as broccoli, cabbage and mustard.

While wasabi may not work as a decongestant, previous research has suggested that it is not without other health benefits. For instance, lab research shows that wasabi may inhibit the growth of cancer cells in test tubes, prevent platelets from forming blood clots, and may even fight asthma or cavities. And, appropriately for a condiment used to season raw fish, wasabi has antimicrobial properties.

During the current study, Cameron and his colleagues from Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Oakland, California asked 22 people to dissolve a lentil-sized amount of wasabi on their tongues multiple times at one-minute intervals, and then report whether the spice affected their sinuses. The researchers also used a device to objectively measure participants' nasal congestion before and after tasting wasabi.

Cameron explained that he and his colleagues used the minimum amount of wasabi needed to cause burning in the nose, a hallmark of the ingredient.

Although people believed that wasabi helped open their nasal passages, it actually appeared to increase congestion.

"If you love wasabi, keep eating it," Cameron said. "But if you want to recommend it as a decongestant, think twice."

ah, monday

mondays are such fun aren't they. knee still bothering while heading up or down stairs. doesn't hurt in the gym, although my legs feel a little weak. knee felt fine doing squats.

my back seems to be getting better as well. this was the first time i attempted free squats outside the hack machine. i was also able to add some weight to back extensions. it doesn't hurt at all any longer and it doesn't feel as weak as it did. i can crank up the interferential stimulator quite a bit before it induces twitching. maybe i'll be able to send the shocker back and just be really diligent about hitting the gym.

since i can't run, i've been loggin sick mileage in the pool. i think this will be a seven or eight mile week...

mom and dad head to belgium thursday. i really hope they have a great time.

Saturday, September 18, 2004

Computer fun

Finally got the permissions to update Darlene's computer to SP2. That takes forever and I pretty much blew the entire morning. I will have to get the gym and swim in this afternoon. I also downloaded the Firefox browser from Mozilla and it seems pretty nice so far. The tabbed browsing is nice and it's nice to know that it's more secure than IE. Here's an interesting blurb from Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal on the browser:

"
Browsing safely: I suggest dumping Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser, which has a history of security breaches. I recommend instead Mozilla Firefox, which is free at www.mozilla.org. It's not only more secure but also more modern and advanced, with tabbed browsing, which allows multiple pages to be open on one screen, and a better pop-up ad blocker than the belated one Microsoft recently added to IE."

Injured reserve

Had a little knee pain last Sunday after the long run. I gave it a couple days of rest to make sure I didn't overdo it because I was coming off a 10-day layoff to get the back healthy. Felt good Wednesday evening on the short run, but about five miles into the Thursday morning workout, the pain along the collateral ligament and meniscus on my left knee got so bad I had to walk.

I talked to the run coach and he said I'd have to take some time off, get some massage and PT and when I start back, to ramp more slowly. Still plenty of time to make Tempe.

I am concerned because I think the root cause of the problem is the new running form he's taught us. One component of the approach is to land more flat-footed. In trying to make this happen I think I might have landed a little more on the balls of my feet and induced some sort of pronation that irritated the ligament. I think as a result, I will let the foot land as it feels most comfortable and just concentrate on not overstepping in front of me.

Interesting and the next week or two will be stressful trying to heal. We'll also see how good my massage therapist and chiropractor are.

Sunday, September 12, 2004

Pictures from the visit to see Tammy in CO

Darlene and I headed out to see Tammy over Labor Day weekend and had a great time. It was really beautiful and we had a good time running around during the days, doing very little in the evenings, and sleeping late.

I set up Tammy's new computer while I was up there, so spent the better part of a couple days setting that up, showing her how to use it, the digital camera, and the card reader. I set up a wireless network because there was no cable jack where she wanted to set up the computer (and didn't want a cable running up the outside of the house), only to take it down because the signal sucked and the throughput was worse than dialup. In the end, Curtis and I ran 100' of coaxial cable underneath the carpet...

We got in an evening of gambling in this mining town turned boomtown, called Black Hawk. It was really interesting as it was carved out a of a narrow canyon and really had the feel of a romanticized mining town. Everyone lost their ass (Curtis didn't get killed like the rest of us) but we had a great time.

We stopped on the way to Black Hawk in Boulder because I wanted to visit Excel Sports. I buy all my bike gear from them and their web and catalog operation is amazing. Turns out the storefront is about the size of my garage with about four bikes in it. The warehouse behind it and the server farm in the data center are the heart and soul of the operation.

We also ventured up to Estes Park to take in the sights, feed the squirrels, do a little shopping and a little fishing.

Altogether a great time!

i could look at this out my back door and not get sick of it too quickly Posted by Hello

colorado is a really ugly state... Posted by Hello

the almighty excel sports in boulder Posted by Hello

the entrance looked promising Posted by Hello

a stretch of the river curtis and i fished while the girls were shopping Posted by Hello

the only fish either of us managed to hook Posted by Hello

mountain goats on the drive back from estes park Posted by Hello

eating right out of their hands Posted by Hello

so many options Posted by Hello

getting cozy Posted by Hello

hey! Posted by Hello

tammy and curtis Posted by Hello

jake and darlene at the top of the hill Posted by Hello

Friday, September 10, 2004

Amazing

On Ground in Iraq,
Soldier Uses Wits
To Hunt Insurgents


By GREG JAFFE
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
September 10, 2004; Page A1

KHALIDIYA, Iraq -- The Army trained Sgt. John McCary, an intelligence soldier, to interrogate prisoners of war in secure military facilities far from the front lines.

But on a recent day, his best hope for getting information was an Iraqi boy, sobbing at the sight of heavily armed Americans in his home.

Sgt. McCary and a team of soldiers had pushed their way into the cramped house, in search of four suspected insurgents. Once inside, they discovered the men had fled, leaving behind a group of shrieking women in black abayas and children in dirty sweatpants.

"We're not going to get s---," Sgt. McCary said. "These women know they can't be detained so there is no reason for them to cooperate." The battalion's general practice is to interrogate the oldest male in a family -- in this case, the crying boy, who looked about 8 years old.

As gunfire sounded in the distance, Sgt. McCary, 28 years old, had to make a split-second decision whether to pull the child off to a corner and try to get him to tell the whereabouts of the insurgents.

Intelligence soldiers like Sgt. McCary are assigned to gather information about the enemy and its plan of attack. In conventional warfare, they study satellite photos of enemy troop movements, intercept radio transmissions and interrogate captured soldiers.

But the shadowy enemy that the U.S. is unexpectedly battling in Iraq requires a far different approach. So Sgt. McCary, who speaks fluent Arabic and specializes in "human intelligence," improvises how he does his job and the Army is improvising how it uses soldiers like him.

Sgt. McCary's experience in Iraq shows why this war is so hard to win. It also highlights why the U.S. Army, a force built for wars against uniformed enemies with tanks and planes, is still struggling to adapt 18 months into its fight with a brutal insurgency that hides among the local population.

Looking to cut costs, the Army slashed its active-duty counterintelligence and human-intelligence force, critical to battling guerrilla fighters, by about one-third in the 1990s. Frontline commanders rarely trained with these troops.

Today senior Army officials in the Pentagon say they are adding 4,000 more intelligence specialists to the current force of 6,000, to meet demands of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But because counterintelligence and human-intelligence soldiers require extra training, including as much as 15 months of foreign-language school, adding them will take years.

To preserve their anonymity, counterintelligence soldiers don't wear nametags or ranks on their uniforms. Because he is leaving Iraq this month, after finishing his one-year tour, Sgt. McCary and his commanders recently allowed a reporter to follow him for several days.

Sgt. McCary graduated from Vassar College with a degree in French literature before enlisting in the Army in 2000. Before basic training he had never touched a gun in his life. Because he had a college degree and a knack for languages, the Army sent him to its Defense Language Institute in Monterey, Calif., for Arabic instruction. He picked up the language so quickly that his instructors nicknamed him "the sponge."

Last fall, he was sent to Khalidiya, an insurgent stronghold near Fallujah. On the way to his battalion's base, his unit was hit with mortar and rocket-propelled-grenade fire.

"I jump out of my seat every time I hear a whump, crack or thump," he wrote in an e-mail home to his parents in North Carolina on Sept. 28, 2003. But the attacks didn't dim his initial optimism. The Iraqis "are a good-hearted people, steeped in traditions different from ours but not inhuman, incomprehensible or impenetrable," his e-mail said.

At first, Sgt. McCary's biggest challenge was showing his 800-man battalion, built to fight rows of opposing tanks, how to use him. Army doctrine states that human-intelligence soldiers are supposed to stay behind the front lines -- not accompany troops on dangerous raids.

That approach didn't work in Iraq. The tank commanders, unable to speak Arabic and unfamiliar with the culture, would often round up everyone in a house they were raiding and bring them in to be interrogated.

Soon the battalion's detention facility was bursting with more than 200 detainees, most of whom had no useful information. Sgt. McCary and his fellow human-intelligence soldiers were working 18-hour days to question them all. "If we could have done preliminary questioning in the field, the majority of the guys we were detaining would never have been brought in," Sgt. McCary says.

By October, Sgt. McCary and a colleague persuaded his bosses to try a different approach. Instead of sitting on the base, Sgt. McCary would go out on raids. "I want to be as close as I can to the hit team without being shot," he says.

In the last year, the sergeant has conducted more than 1,000 interrogations of Iraqi insurgents, trying to figure out how they are organized and where they are hiding. He's walked hundreds of patrols, dodged rocket-propelled-grenade fire and watched friends -- both Iraqi and American -- die grisly deaths. So far, 19 soldiers and three Iraqi translators in his battalion have been killed.

His presence on raids helped in efforts to bring in only Iraqis who had actual knowledge about the insurgency. It also had another benefit. Interrogating detainees in the first few minutes after capture allowed him to question suspects while they are disoriented and unable to construct a good alibi. He says his battalion is the only one he knows of that uses counterintelligence soldiers in this way. "I didn't realize how innovative we were until I started talking with friends from other units," he says.

Lt. Col. Gerard Healy, an Army spokesman in the Pentagon, says it isn't unheard of for counterintelligence soldiers to accompany troops on raids. "But we don't have enough of these assets to use them in this war on a regular basis," he says.

Learning to Lie
In the field, Sgt. McCary learned other critical skills. One was the ability to lie. "If you are not a Muslim brother in this culture you are nothing, so I had to construct an entirely new working persona," he says. Though he has no Arab heritage, he tells Iraqis his mother is Lebanese. He sprinkles every conversation with asides such as "Praise be to God." When a local says he is afraid to talk because the mujahedeen will kill him, Sgt. McCary recites a phrase commonly used in Iraq: "A good Muslim fears only one person." Then the sergeant points to the sky. As part of the ritual, the other person says, "Allah."

Last month, Sgt. McCary and 30 other soldiers set out to find an insurgent who they believe heads a terrorist cell that has been attacking them. The battalion raided the insurgent's house five months ago and found bomb-making equipment and grenade launchers, but not the insurgent. Recently they got a tip that a local government minister was harboring the cell leader at his home.

But just getting basic information -- such as the exact location of the minister's house -- is difficult. There are no street signs in most Iraqi cities. Many homes look alike and none of them have numbers. Operating under conventional rules of warfare, the Army doesn't allow Sgt. McCary to don local clothes or ride in civilian vehicles. He must wear his uniform when he goes into town. So Sgt. McCary couldn't disguise himself and have the tipster discreetly lead him to the house.

He also couldn't tell locals why he was looking for the minister's house. In the last few months, insurgents in the area have killed or attempted to kill anyone seen cooperating with U.S. troops.

Sgt. McCary's source told him generally where the minister lived. The insurgent they were looking for drove a green car, which the source said should be parked by the house. To confirm he had the right house, Sgt. McCary pretended to be an Army civil-affairs officer, doing a survey of the local infrastructure. The ruse would give him a good excuse to inquire about the minister's house.

"It is extremely duplicitous, but if you walk up to people and say, 'Damn it, we want to know where this bad guy lives; we want to help you,' it is not effective," he says.

Sgt. McCary and his fellow soldiers packed themselves tightly into a small, armored troop carrier. "I hope you put on deodorant today," he joked to the soldier next to him.

"No, but I changed my underwear this morning,"' the young soldier replied.
"Just for me, or just in case?" Sgt. McCary deadpanned.
Once in the neighborhood, a hive of brown, two-story houses surrounded by mud walls, Sgt. McCary talked to the locals. A man in a white dish-dasha, a long dress-like shirt, complained his family was getting only four hours of electricity a day. Another local in a Los Angeles Lakers T-shirt told him U.S. troops were shooting in their neighborhood at night.

Sgt. McCary spotted a boy of about 11, standing lookout in front of what he thought might be the minister's house. He wanted to get a picture of the boy for his records. But the boy was adamant he didn't want his photograph taken by the Americans.

"Don't be such a girl," Sgt. McCary teased the boy, telling him they were just in town taking a survey of the local power and water facilities. Another counterintelligence soldier crouched down next to the boy, pretending he was posing for a souvenir snapshot to send back home.

"Wow, we are definitely going to hell," Sgt. McCary said in English, as he snapped the picture.
In 30 more minutes of questioning, Sgt. McCary duped two locals into telling him where the minister actually lived -- by first asking about the local garbage, electricity and other municipal services.

When they identified the minister's house, the tank platoon accompanying him prepared to raid it. But Sgt. McCary told them to hold off. The green car -- which was supposed to belong to the insurgent -- wasn't parked outside. They would have to try another time.

"When you are a [tank] commander, the mindset is, there's a bad guy, let's kick his a--. That doesn't work here. This is like police work," Sgt. McCary says.

The day was humbling in another way. The insurgent's hideout was only about 100 yards from where U.S. forces had targeted him five months earlier. The reluctance of locals to tell U.S. troops where insurgents hide is frustrating, Sgt. McCary says, allowing the enemy to move easily. "We are so removed from Khalidiya these bad guys know they can thumb their noses at us."

Despite the setbacks, a year in Iraq has made Sgt. McCary and his battalion a smarter, tougher, more cynical fighting force. The same tank commanders who had never worked with a counterintelligence soldier before now go out of their way to request his presence on raids and patrols. Sgt. McCary's battalion commander nominated him recently for the Bronze Star.

"You couldn't design a better counter-insurgent," says Maj. John Nagl, who is third in command of Sgt. McCary's battalion. "He's interested in other cultures, willing to question his own beliefs and mores."

The next day, Sgt. McCary and a team of soldiers set out on the mission to find four insurgents suspected of launching attacks on U.S. forces. Two of the four men he was looking for are members of the local U.S.-trained Iraqi National Guard security force. Sgt. McCary knew he didn't have enough information to detain the men. But his command was hoping that by questioning them he could put a scare into them and elicit some intelligence.

On a blistering morning, the soldiers pushed through the gate of the suspects' house, finding nothing but shrieking women and small children milling about in a dirt courtyard outside. In the corner was a freshly washed black motorcycle, still coated in suds. Sgt. McCary took the bike's presence as a sign that one of the men they were looking for had been in the house recently but fled.

He quickly began firing questions at the women in Arabic. "Whose motorcycle is this?" he asked.
"It's broken," a woman replied.
He repeated the question. This time the same woman told him she found it on the street.
Interrogating women rarely produces good intelligence, Sgt. McCary says. Arresting women in this male-dominated society is deeply offensive to most Iraqis, so U.S. troops avoid it at all costs. Because the women know they are unlikely to be detained, they have little incentive to cooperate.

The battalion's unwritten policy is to interrogate the oldest male on the scene. In this case it was the sobbing boy. Sgt. McCary grabbed the child by the wrist and led him into the dark house off the courtyard. When his mother tried to follow, Sgt. McCary yelled at her to stay away.

Outside the mother began crying, in English, "Mister. Baby. Mister. Baby."
Rapid-Fire Questions
Inside the house, Sgt. McCary fired questions at the terrified boy. Once the boy realized Sgt. McCary wasn't going to hurt him, he told different stories; that he didn't know any of the men they were looking for, or that the men had all moved away. So Sgt. McCary took off his helmet, leaned in close and began to yell in an effort to unsettle him.

Using a photo that he pulled off the wall, Sgt. McCary got the boy to identify the men he was looking for. He scribbled a name over each face.

Then the sergeant took the picture next door, hoping to get the names confirmed with a second source. The place had no roof or furniture. The floor was covered with dirt and the morning's breakfast. Sgt. McCary led the oldest male present, a boy of about 6 years old, aside and showed him the picture.

A few minutes later, the soldiers heard a loud thud. It was the first of four roadside bombs that would explode in Khalidiya that day. Soldiers crouched behind walls for protection. The second boy and his mother confirmed the names Sgt. McCary got at the first house.

Sgt. McCary and the rest of the platoon piled back into the Humvees. The mission was a success of sorts. Sgt. McCary now knew what the suspected insurgents looked like. But it was exhausting. "The fact that I have to terrify a kid ... to get the truth is bs---," he said. "Morally it is questionable. But you've got to go with what you've got."

A small percentage of the insurgents who launch attacks against U.S. forces in Khalidiya are foreign fighters from places such as Yemen and Saudi Arabia. Some of the terrorists come from nearby Fallujah, which isn't currently under U.S. control and has become something of an insurgent safe haven. But many of the insurgents in Khalidiya seem to be locals, Sgt. McCary and his commanders say, drawn to attack the U.S. by a combination of nationalism and religious obligation.

In May, a good friend of Sgt. McCary's had his leg blown off by a rocket-propelled grenade. U.S. forces quickly grabbed the insurgent who fired it. Back at the base, Sgt. McCary asked the enemy fighter if he was a mujahedeen, or holy warrior.

The man shook his head no. "Then why did you blow off my friend's leg?" Sgt. McCary recalls asking.
The insurgent, a small man in his 20s, said he did it because he was told to by his religious leader.
Above his bunk, Sgt. McCary keeps photographs of two friends, an Iraqi father and son who worked as translators for the Army in Khalidiyah until insurgents kidnapped them in broad daylight from their home of 40 years. The mujahedeen murdered the 75-year-old father and beat the son unconscious.

Shortly after the kidnapping, Sgt. McCary e-mailed his family back home in North Carolina. "This is such a barbaric place. I cannot fathom the depths the Iraqis endured to reach this level," he wrote.

In the e-mail he added that he wished those responsible for the killings, maimings and kidnappings would simply "dissipate.... I wish they would transform into average citizens, fathers, sons and brothers. I don't care about bloodlust, justice or revenge," he wrote.

Sgt. McCary and his commanders know that won't happen. They say the key to defeating this or any insurgency is convincing locals to tell them where the enemy hides. "But the natural inclination of the Iraqis is to support their own people," he says.

He remains hopeful that more Iraqis will eventually help the U.S. track down the enemy. "I just don't see how they could remain loyal to the insurgency, but it is possible. In this culture, Allah trumps all. Religious loyalties can never be questioned," he says.

Does he think he and his fellow soldiers are winning the war in Khalidiya? "I've learned a lot. I have been extremely successful. I couldn't have asked for a better command," he says.

"Am I winning? I don't know. I am just fighting."