Tuesday, November 30, 2004

This better translate into a good bonus...

Dell sees 60 percent rise in Web site's holiday shoppers
Central Texas malls and retail stores aren't the only businesses thankful for increased consumer traffic during the busy Thanksgiving holiday weekend.

Round Rock-based Dell Inc. is also singing the praises of American consumers.
From Thursday, Nov. 25 through Sunday, Nov. 28, the computer giant's U.S. consumer business Web site got more than 3.3 million visits from shoppers -- more than a 60 percent increase over the same four-day period in 2003.

John Hamlin, senior vice president of Dell's U.S. Consumer business says the upswing can be attributed to three factors: the convenience of shopping from home, prices reductions on Dell's products and the addition of new consumer electronics like plasma televisions, photo printers and Dell Pocket DJ music players.

Dell (Nasdaq: DELL) is one of Central Texas' fastest-growing companies, reporting a 2003 revenue of $41.4 billion. The company employs about 16,000 people in Central Texas.



© 2004 American City Business Journals Inc.

The Snowy Route

I looked at the routes to Boise today through a couple other driving directions sites today to compare southern routes.  The suggested route from MapQuest had us heading due north until Kansas and then banking left through Denver, Salt Lake City, and on to Boise.  This looked kinda like going around your ass to get to your elbow, as the route through Amarillo, Santa Fe, Denver, SLC seemed more direct when I looked at the map.

I looked on a couple other travel map sites and they all suggested the same route.  The last one actually provided the eureka info we were looking for.  The route makes sense because it is all on interstates, and it has the fewest number of mountain passes.  I thought one of the more southern routes might be better, but it looks like those are pretty mountainous, and would be over less-maintained roads. 

It looks like it is pretty flat until just before Denver and you only have to cross a couple mountain passes, one in Denver, and another in Salt Lake City.  The odds of those interstates being plowed regularly are good, and we will probably have an easier time finding roadside services and cell phone coverage.

Monday, November 29, 2004

The 1900-mile drive

Darlene and I were talking about what would be involved in taking Sheila's new car to her.  Darlene had planned on driving it up to Denver either next weekend or the weekend after, then flying back.  It would be about 1100 miles to Denver and then a one-way plane ticket.  I am not too keen about sending my cute, young, blonde wife on a two-day drive across a number of states by herself, so that got me into the frame.  Quickly, this is looking like $1000 in plane tickets, and a weekend blown.  That means no training during this time as well.

I formulated a new plan that we are kicking around.  Instead of doing the weekend banzai run, why not just drive it up when we head there for Christmas, then use the back half of our already-purchased round trip tickets to get home.  Sounds like a lot of driving...and it is!  1900 miles; 29 hours, according to MapQuest.  Assuming the weather is good… 

We will talk about it more, but we would probably try to break it up into two fourteen-hour days.  We will need to come up with some car games and some books on tape...

My HR monitor called me a wuss this morning...

There is a nifty feature on the heart rate monitor Darlene bought me recently called the OwnOptimizer.  It adds a little more science to something I've been trying to track in a much less sophisticated manner using a stopwatch and how I feel.  By measuring (with a stopwatch) my HR laying down, then standing up, and determining if the delta is larger than my baseline difference of 8 beats per minute.

Now, the OwnOptimizer test tells me whether I have recovered enough for my next training session, without me having to guess and interpret.  The OwnOptimizer recovery test is an easy and reliable way to determine whether my training program is optimally developing my performance.  Training too easy doesn't get you to the level of fitness you need if you want to compete, and overtraining is worse because you are more susceptible to injury and you're not getting any faster.  In order to do it right, you need to stress your body and let it adapt through recovery.  The balancing act is to overload your body enough to force physiological change, but not so much that you damage it beyond it's ability to recover, or spend so much time training that you don't allow it to recover. 

Many athletes agonize over the right balance, but more importantly, identifying when they've overdone it.  The dead giveaways are chronic fatigue, chronic illness, injury, depression, or elevated heart rate (per my primitive test first described).  The problem with the unscientific test is that these symptoms become apparent over an extended period of time and require lots of recovery.  This new test allows me to run it a couple time a week, and make immediate corrections.

It measures five different parameters during a six-minute test (still laying and standing).  It keys on resting HR, standing HR at peak, standing HR at base, HR min and HR max, and the time it takes to vacillate between the extremes.  It returns a 1-5 result signifying (1) well rested, (2) recovered from last session and ready to hit it again, (3) need to train easy today to allow for recovery, (4) you've been well rested for a while, so you need to pick it up some, or (5) you have been training too hard and need to take a couple days off entirely to recover.

Since I've been building a low-intensity base to start off my new training season, I have expected it to provide a baseline of 2 readings.  To be expected because I haven't been hitting the workouts very hard, just going to a very long time.  I have been racking up lots of 2s over the last three weeks.  I figured the measurement this morning after yesterdays 90-mile ride would probably yield a 3, but I got the spur in the form of a 4. 

"Hey you slacker, you need to do some training."

So, looks like I have a significant base built and can start to try to adapt some of those type IIb muscle fibers into type IIa through higher intensity workouts.  Looking forward to injecting a little more pace...

Sunday, November 21, 2004

The Mopping Manifesto Revisited

Despite the recent gift of the Roomba, which does significantly reduce the frequency of having to vacuum and mop, the filth on the floor led us to tackle the house today. Darlene did most of the other thankless chores, like srubbing toilets, bathrooms, and kitchens, while I set about the task of cleaning the floors.

This required a cursory pass with the upright vac to get the stuff the Roomba (which we've named Sonia, in honor of our fired housekeeper), followed by a laborious wet and dry mopping. After finding the usual bathtub used for dumping and refilling clogged with mop debris, I spent about twenty minutes with a combination of coat hangers, screwdrivers, and cursing cleaning it out.

Determined not to relive that experience, we decided to empty and fill the five-gallon mop bucket in the driveway with the hose. After several trips up and down the stairs in the garage with the bucket and realizing that I was reducing the coefficient of friction on an already steep driveway, the idea didn't sound so great any longer. Top that off with the realization that by sending the Pine Sol down the driveway, I was probably creating more iceburgs on Lake Travis, I'll have to rethink this method.

Four hours later I was rinsing the Pine Sol down the driveway to ensure that my wife, who left during a light drizzle, would be able to get back up the driveway on her way back. Fortunately, we're under a flash flood warning for the remainder of the day...

I don't really like mopping, but I do like clean floors. So hear me, makers of the Roomba, make a mopper!

The long short ride

It was supposed to rain all weekend, but I woke up Saturday morning to find it thickly overcast, after only a light drizzle Friday night. I had really wanted to try to get a 100-mile ride in over the weekend. Seeing this as my window of opportunity, I sprang into action!

I got through the first few miles with little more than a light mist. It was actually nice as the cloud cover had kept the temperatures down into the low sixties: great riding weather. The sky looked cloudy, but not heavy, and I had the Holy Grail of long rides developing: a tailwind on the way home!

Much like day sailing, where you're well advised to head out into the wind in the morning so you are just cruising back in the afternoon. Instead of fighting out the tacks
to get back up wind when you're tired, you just sheet out the mainsail and the genoa, grab a beer, and head for the marina.

And, although the beer is not the way to go heading home, its a great thing to have the wind to your back when you're headed home with five hours in the saddle under your belt. At one point, it was actually getting warm enough that I was starting to get slicked in sweat. They do a lot of business in cotton in Central Texas. I know this because it was about this time that I got passed by a "empty" tractor-trailer that was spewing cotton chunks everywhere. After it passed, I looked down and saw that my legs and arms were coated with fuzzy, white cotton. I must have looked like a flocked Christmas tree; where's a camera when you need it?

Anyhow, I was headed south toward Elgin and I had planned on stopping for water, doing a small loop to get the 10 or so miles I needed to get to 100, and then heading home. The crosswind that would be my homeward-bound tailwind was still blowing and the clouds in its direction or origin still looked unthreatening. Unfortunately, there were very dark clouds forming in the direction of my route home.

I considered heading straight home, rather than looping the additional miles, and just seizing the good luck that had gotten me the dry miles thusfar. One of Darlene's infamous phrases seemed to fit the occasion: "Don't kick [sic] a gift horse in the mouth." No sooner had I marveled at the malapropism that the thunder started roaring from the cloud pattern that clouded my escape home. Envisioning myself utilizing my homebound tailwind and catching the tail of this storm, then trailing it all the way home like some Charlie Brown character where the little cloud follows them everywhere, the extra loop gained some appeal.

Unfortunately, two miles from Elgin and the nearest dry place, the seemingly innocent clouds lurking upstream in my tailwind surrounded me like multiple felon and started peppering me with huge drops. I'm not one to be overly concerned about riding in the rain, save the discontent that each rain ride requires about an hour of bike cleaning and working the wet out of the bearings. However, the lightning that, by my count was getting closer all the time, was starting to freak me out. Riding a metal object in a lightning storm is up there with swimming in Australia with the seals. Maybe this is my argument for my next carbon fiber bike, Darlene...

I skidded into a Chevron in Elgin where they served hot coffee, and my wonderful wife was kind enough to come get me. This saved me from the last 30 miles in torrential downpour that didn't let up for our entire drive home.

At least I got 70 miles in...

Who says it doesn't get cold in TX?

These pics were taken from the deck of a coworkers house Friday morning on the banks of Lake Travis, 62 miles north of Mansfield Dam. I managed to get back toward town across the low water crossing as the lake level was at 693 feet and rising. As you can see, the water gets pretty cold and the rain has melted blocks off the glaciers to the north of Lake Travis.

Iceburgs on Lake Travis. Posted by Hello

This is actually foam that is churned up when the river floods. Posted by Hello

As Dad said...

"I'm never going back in the water again. I may never even shower again..."

This picture popped up on Yahoo as an attachment to a story about a elderly woman in Australia who was killed by a Great White this week. Apparently she swam every day for the last 17 years. They didn't say she did anything terribly stupid like swim with the seals or sea lions, but it sounds like swimming in the ocean in Australia is still flirting with danger. Looks like her number was up.

This is a Great White somewhere out in the Indian Ocean. They were towing a fake seal behind a boat through an area where the Whites come to feed on the seals as they haul out on some island. This scared the shit out of me... Posted by Hello

Thursday, November 18, 2004

The incessant rain

We have gotten tons of rain recently. Kinda nice not to have to worry about watering anything, and the snapdragons I planted around the Indian Hawthorne are starting to come back. They looked like they weren't going to make it shortly after planting, but they've perked back up. I think we got six inches of rain on Wednesday alone. Looks like no end in sight, so we might be taking a boat to the airport for Thanksgiving.

Interesting because of our proximity to the LCRA lakes. Lake Travis is the big one on the north side of town, Austin is the skinny, but really nice one that runs through the really expensive parts of town, and Town Lake is the cesspool that runs through downtown (where I had to swim coincidentally for a triathlon in May).

All three are dammed up parts of the Colorado River and are managed by the Lower Colorado River Authority. There are a number of other lakes north and south of Austin, but those three previously mentioned are the primary here in Austin.

Anyhow, with all the rain, Travis is nearing capacity. Travis is a little different in that it is not just a part of the Colorado, but is also the nexis of the Llano and Pedernales rivers. WIth the widespread rain recently, it is filling up from all sides. The Mansfield Dam tops out at 715 feet. Last I heard, we were at 693 feet and rising. They have had all six open in the past because they fear for the integrity of the dam when it starts coming over the spillway. If Mansfield goes, Austin is likely under water.

They have opened four of the six flood gates so far, and are moving some pretty serious volume through it. The tricky part about that is that Lake Austin is a constant-level lake, with very little ability to withstand fluctuations in shoreline depth. The dam at the south end of Lake Austin is only about five feet above the usual water level. When that floods, lots of really expensive homes are in real trouble. Town Lake leaves a little more margin for error, but still can't flood too much, or last time they had all six gates open, Lake Austin and Town Lake flooded dramatically.

So, they have to open up the dam with cracker-jack timing in order to keep the lower lakes level. Should be fun to watch over the next few days as the rain continues. I'm going to see if I can't talk Darlene into coming with me to have a look at the dam. A big bridge goes right over the river at the dam and is a good (and safe) place to watch the water churn underneath.

It sounds like the Arizona branch of the Colorado has also seen its share of rain recently and they are talking about releasing a big rush of water from Glen Canyon to rebuild some of the sandbars to protect a bunch of endangered species. A wet one!

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

Shannon and TX culture shock

Shannon was in town for work again this week and we had talked about taking her to Dallas Nite Club last time she was here. For those of you unfamiliar with Austin, Dallas is the quintessential country bar. Small, smoky, country music, and stuffed to the gills with people.

Shannon brought two of her friends from work, Claire and Heather, with her and the five of us had a quick bite at Dave & Buster's just down the street from Dallas. Had a great time and her friends were really nice.

We finally got in to Dallas and made our way in around nine, before the crowd got too thick to move. Amazing how you seem to see the same faces there year after year...

Anyway, none of the girls had seen anything like this joint before and it was a lot of fun watching them take it all in. Darlene had some of her old friends to dance with, so I took Shannon and Heather out a couple times to teach them the basics and soon enough, they were all out on the floor. Claire had an especially difficult time fighting them off.

As usual, it was great to see Shannon again and we had a great time getting together with her again. Unfortunately, it sounds like this was probably the last time she'll be here in Austin for work for a while.

Monday, November 15, 2004

No wonder premiums are high...

Spitzer: Dell employees affected by improper insurance practices
New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has sued a California consulting firm specializing in life, accident and disability insurance, alleging that the company steered business to insurers in exchange for payoffs -- a practice that may have raised premiums for individual employees.

The action against San Diego-based Universal Life Resources Inc. is part of Spitzer's ongoing investigation into fraud and anti-competitive practices in the insurance industry. The investigation has already led to a civil suit against Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc., and the criminal pleas of three insurance company executives.

Universal Life Resources clients include: Round Rock-based Dell Inc.(Nasdaq: DELL), Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) and Atlanta-based United Parcel Service Inc. (NYSE: UPS).

Also Friday, the New York deparment of insurance issued citations against Universal Life for violations of state insurance law.

"Today's case demonstrates that the corrupt practices first laid bare in the Marsh suit are present in additional sectors of the industry," Spitzer said. "Secret payoffs and conflicts of interest that infected the market for property and casualty insurance have taken root in the employee benefits market as well. What is particularly egregious in this case is that the costs of (Universal Life Resources') concealed payments were ultimately borne by individual employees, who were in no position to know about or contest these illegal practices."

The civil complaint filed Nov. 12 in state Supreme Court in Manhattan alleges that Universal Life Resources had undisclosed agreements with some of the country's largest life insurance companies, including MetLife, Prudential and Unum Provident, under which millions of dollars were paid to Universal Life Resources in exchange for steering the business of its clients. Further, the complaint alleges that Universal Life Resources imposed secret fees for "communication services," such as printing of informational materials, which were far above market rate and which employees ultimately paid through higher premiums. These payments accounted for more than two-thirds of Universal Life Resources' revenue in 2003.

Saturday, November 13, 2004

New look and feel

True to form, I can't keep anything the same for too long. To that end, I've changed the template for the site. Hope you like it. If not, it will probably change again in the near future...

Thursday, November 11, 2004

Looks like that's one less pill to worry about taking

Vitamin E Supplements
Can Pose Serious Risks,
A New Study Concludes

By JENNIFER CORBETT DOOREN
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
November 11, 2004; Page D1
Toss out those bottles of vitamin E. That's the recommendation coming from some doctors at the American Heart Association scientific meeting in New Orleans this week.

In research presented at the heart conference yesterday, Edgar R. Miller, an associate professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, says that taking a vitamin E supplement carries serious risks.

Dr. Miller's view is based on an analysis of 19 previous studies involving 136,000 patients. According to his analysis, those taking 400 international units per day or more (the amount in most vitamin E supplements) had higher overall mortality rates in given periods -- about 5% higher -- than those who didn't take supplements. As a result, he and other doctors recommend that people stop taking vitamin E supplements.

In the 1990s, sales of vitamin E began soaring when some studies started hinting of health benefits. One particular study released in the mid-1990s showed that vitamin E reduced the risk of having a fatal heart attack, and this prompted many physicians to recommend that patients take a daily vitamin E supplement. Other research has suggested that vitamin E, an antioxidant, reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, cancer and might even protect against Alzheimer's disease. Indeed, foods high in antioxidants are overwhelmingly endorsed for their health benefits, and continue to be.

In the enthusiasm over the potential health benefits, some doctors initially overlooked findings that the overall risk of death from high-dose vitamin E supplements was slightly increased.

Dr. Miller cautioned that the 19 studies he analyzed involved many patients over 60 who had pre-existing conditions. Still, he says, "Increasing doses of vitamin E were linked to an increase in death." While the reasons weren't pinpointed, it could be because high doses of vitamin E displace other antioxidants in the body and also increase the risk of bleeding. There was no increased risk of death at levels of about 150 IUs or below.

A daily multivitamin is still considered fine for people to consume if they choose, because they contain a much lower amount of vitamin E. The amount found in a typical multivitamin ranges from 30 to 45 IUs.

Raymond Gibbons, a professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic, says he and other physicians have unsuccessfully been trying to persuade their patients to stop taking vitamin E supplements for the past couple of years amid increasing evidence that high doses offer no benefit. Patients continue popping the vitamins, he says, because they are convinced that these and other supplements offer a range of perceived but unproven benefits.

While sales of vitamin E supplements have dropped in the past few years, they still totaled $706 million in 2003, according to the Nutrition Business Journal, which tracks trends in the supplement industry. Vitamin E sales peaked at $868 million in 1999.

For years doctors have said that a regular healthy diet provides enough vitamin E and supplements -- despite their popularity -- weren't needed.

Generally, Dr. Gibbons says, doctors were concerned that patients would forget to take a needed drug if they were busy taking supplements that did no good. Now amid new evidence that vitamin E could do harm, physicians say it's more urgent to call a halt.

"The idea that vitamin E isn't beneficial or even harmful is something we need to alert the public on," says Robert Eckel, a professor of medicine at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

Most people easily get enough vitamin E from their diets, because it is contained in fats such as vegetable oil, nuts and green vegetables, Dr. Miller says, adding that people need only about 10 IUs of vitamin E each day.

Dr. Miller, the Johns Hopkins researcher, says he started looking at vitamin E studies for a chapter in a book he was writing about the benefits of vitamins in protecting against cardiovascular disease. He says he was surprised when he found negative impacts from high-doses of vitamin E rather than positive ones.

For his analysis, which appears in the latest edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr. Miller examined studies that took place between 1993 and 2004 and involved more than 136,000 patients in North America, Europe and China. The trials were all placebo-controlled; each had a group of patients that were given a sugar pill rather than the vitamin. The risk of death was estimated by comparing the death rates in the placebo group to that of the vitamin E group. Some of the studies also involved the use of other vitamins.

The Council for Responsible Nutrition, a Washington, D.C.-based group that represents supplement ingredient manufacturers, says it disagrees with the Miller analysis. John Hathcock, CRN's vice president for scientific and international affairs, says the findings were "driven by the results from a few of these clinical trials, some of which are suspect." He noted that the Institute of Medicine, which makes recommendations on upper limits for vitamin supplements has set a limit of vitamin E supplements of 1,000 milligrams.

The Institute of Medicine sets recommended daily dietary guidelines that it periodically updates. In an update in 2000, the IOM placed an upper limit on vitamin E of 1,000 milligrams or about 1,500 IUs of natural vitamin E or 1,000 of synthetic vitamin E. Amounts beyond that are not recommended because it raises the risk of bleeding, the IOM says.

But the dietary intake guidelines state that upper limits should not be considered the recommended amount.
Dr. Miller says his vitamin E findings are similar to earlier findings on beta carotene. Two major studies showed that beta carotene supplementation resulted in an increased risk for lung cancer and death. Doctors then stopped recommending beta carotene supplements.

Wednesday, November 10, 2004

Good Wifekeeping points

When we bought Darlene's computer, it came with a free flat-panel upgrade, so we jumped on it.  Unfortunately it was a 15" and looked pathetically small next to the 19" flat we got with my computer.  I have felt bad about it every time I saw her squinting at the screen.  I got an e-mail from Dell detailing $50 discounts on refurbished flat-panel monitors.  Tacked on my 15% discount and it was really reasonable.  Got it and set it up last night.  She says she loves it; I hope that garners me some points.

Signs of life


Despite the disappointing MRI results, things are starting to look up just a little.  I have been running on the track so as to not irritate the IT band unnecessarily (hills put more stress on it) and was able to get through 1.5 miles Sunday, then 2 miles yesterday.  I'll gun for 2.5 tomorrow and 3 this weekend.  Hopefully the slow ramp up will get me back into it.  After a while, I'll try working back in some hills.  Fingers crossed...

Sunday, November 07, 2004

Best Man Getting Engaged!!!

Darlene and I had dinner with Sean and Martha last night in San Marcos (half way between SA and Austin). They decided recently to buy a house together and the builders have already broken ground and framed it. Anyway, she's got to suspect it's coming.

Sean bought the ring yesterday and has plans to take Martha to Santa Monica in two weeks for a short weekend trip. Apparently Martha loves Santa Monica, the pier, and the carousel. So Sean's going to surprise her with the trip, head out, get some dinner, take her to the carousel, get her on a horse and try not to drop the ring...

So that's good news for them and we're happy that the two of them are finally going to get married. Another married couple...

Sean's also having a poker night next weekend, so I might get to preview the ring.

signs of life

rode 90 miles yesterday and felt pretty good. not too sore this morning and my hr monitor told me that i was completely recovered. thought i might be developing the start of a saddle sore, so i opted out of a ride this morning.

i did, however, take the new running shoes down to the track along with the foot pod for the new hr monitor. i was able to successfully calibrate the distance so it should now track that for me. the new shoes seem to be helping as they feel good. i ran 1.5 miles without too much tenderness in the it band, but stopped because it felt like it might be coming on. i think the flat terrain of the track will be a good place to try to ramp back up, and i'm encouraged that it wasn't too bad today.

i will give it another shot tuesday morning to get on the track to run a couple more. with any luck, i will be able to start adding mileage and get to this ironman training soon. i will run in a different direction each time to keep the knee from getting tweaked by all left turns. here's hoping!

A handout image released on October 31, 2004 shows three torpid dormice, in the winning photograph of the BBC TV Countryfile photographic competition. The image was taken by Steven Robinson at Wakehurst Place in southern England as part of the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew's monitoring program of this endangered species in conjunction with English Nature. Posted by Hello

sprinkler work

i think my dad has identified just the tool for our sprinkler system installation in february:

Ultimate Earth Mover

The Largest Bucket Wheel Excavator in the world..... Built by Krupp, seen here crossing a federal highway in Germany en route to its destination (an
open-pit coal mine), it is cheaper to move the thing like this, than to construct or re-assemble on-site. The mover stands at over 311 feet tall and is over 705 feet long. It weighs over 45,500 tons (yes that's 45 thousand tons!) Cost $100 million USD, took 5 years to design & manufacture and 5 years to assemble. It only requires 5 people to operate it.


The Bucket Wheel is over 70 feet in diameter with 20 buckets, each of which can hold over 530 cubic feet of material. A 6-foot man can stand up inside one of the buckets. It moves on 12 crawlers (each is 12 feet wide, 7'-10" high and 46 feet long). There are 8 crawlers in front and 4 in back. It has a maximum speed of 1 mile in 3 hours (1/3 mile/hour). It can remove over 76,455 cubic meters (100,000 large dump trucks at 40Yds. Ea.) of overburden per day.


 Posted by Hello

 Posted by Hello

 Posted by Hello

 Posted by Hello

 Posted by Hello

my new early-morning running partner

with the recent news of the mountain lion prowling the valleys and hills in the area surrounding our house, i was a little concerned about running alone at 5:00 a.m.. now, i think i've identified my new running partner to keep my mind at ease...

1 of 4 Posted by Hello

2 of 4 Posted by Hello

3 of 4 Posted by Hello

4 of 4 Posted by Hello

the big daddy elk encountered on my ride last weekend. sorry about the picture quality; this was as close as i could get and i snapped it with a picture phone. Posted by Hello

this is the real before picture for the replanting. looks like i actually pasted in the same after pic twice... Posted by Hello

Saturday, November 06, 2004

Mom doing well

Mom is doing very well after her surgery.  She's back at work and feeling better.  The usual aches and pains you would expect from back surgery and a bad taste in her mouth from the anesthesia, but generally, she's doing well.

Friday, November 05, 2004

Key to a happy marriage?

The Key to a Lasting
Marriage: Combat

Even Happy Couples
Aren't Really Compatible,
Suggests Latest Research

By HILARY STOUT
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
November 4, 2004; Page D1
A growing body of research suggests there is no such thing as a compatible couple.
This may come as no surprise to all those who have endured years of thermostat wars, objectionable spending habits and maddening tendencies at the wheel. But it flies smack in the face of Hollywood, Shakespeare, most people's core fantasies, and all those dating Web sites touting scientific screening to find a perfect match.

Years of relationship studies by some leading figures in the field make it increasingly clear that most couples, whether they're happy or unhappy, have a similar number of irreconcilable differences. What is more, all couples -- happy or not -- tend to argue about the same things. Top of the list, whether you are rich or poor, is money. Other common topics include household chores, work obligations, kids and differing priorities. Golf course or family outing? Vacation with the kids or without them?

"Compatibility is misunderstood and overrated," says Ted Huston, a professor of psychology and human ecology. Mr. Huston and his colleagues have been following 168 couples since they married as twentysomethings during the 1980s. They interviewed them two months after their wedding, then again 14 months, 26 months and 13 years later about two potential marriage minefields: leisure interests and the expectations about who should do what around the house.

After 13.5 years, 105 of the couples still were married and 56 were divorced. (The others were widowed or couldn't be located.) The researchers found that the couples who divorced "were not less similar" in either category.

This study and others like it also make clear that most disagreements that arise in a marriage -- 69% of them, according to work by John Gottman, a relationship researcher at the University of Washington -- are never resolved.

The result has been a gradual shift in marriage therapy toward helping spouses manage, accept, and even "honor" their discord, rather than trying to resolve the unresolvable. One national couples-counseling program suggests spouses schedule a regular weekly date to argue. Others now offer instruction in fighting. Some encourage couples to single out problems that can be dealt with and accept that most (like how tidy the house should be) will never be resolved.

"If I were to characterize the way programs have changed in last half-decade that would be the major thing," Mr. Huston says.

Of course some conflicts do matter deeply -- she wants children, he doesn't, to name a big one; alcoholism and infidelity, to name a couple more. Differing religions and cultural attitudes also are problematic, especially after the couple has children, says Scott Stanley, co-director of the Center for Marital and Family Studies at the University of Denver. He and co-director Howard Markman have done extensive studies tracking couples from courtship through years of marriage.

But the bottom line, Mr. Markman says, is that "virtually all couples, happy and unhappy, are going to argue, particularly in the early stages" of marriage. "What tends to predict the future of a relationship is not what you argue about, but when you do argue, how you handle your negative emotions."

Growing consensus around that notion has led some in the profession to develop rules of engagement that can make arguing less destructive:

Don't escalate an argument by blurting out sweeping generalizations: "You always..." Stay on the specific subject. Don't drag past events, behavior and lingering grudges into the discussion.

Try not to interrupt -- let your spouse finish making a point before you jump in.
Take a little time to cool down after a heated argument. But within an hour, Mr. Gottman recommends having a "reconciliatory conversation," which will should result in a more level-headed, productive discussion.

Researchers at Mr. Gottman's Relationship Research Laboratory (known informally to people in the field as the "love lab") videotaped couples arguing and monitored their heart rates. When the heart rates rose above 100, the researchers interrupted and said (falsely) that their equipment was malfunctioning. They asked couples to stop and read a magazine until it was fixed. Once both people's heart rates had dropped down to normal range -- after about a half-hour -- the researchers announced the equipment was fixed and the couples started up their disagreement again.

The change after the interlude was marked. "It was like it was a different relationship," Mr. Gottman says. Everyone was "much more rational and creative."

While airing differences is important, make sure to set aside some time where discussing areas of discord is off-limits, Mr. Stanley and Mr. Markman say. A walk by the river on a beautiful autumn day isn't the time to bring up problems; it is a time to enjoy each other and remember what attracted you to each other in the first place.

Instead -- and this may seem weird -- set aside a time to talk about the things that are bothering you. Like many married couples, Jim and Kathryn Lewis have a Saturday "date" built into their weekly schedules. The purpose isn't to catch a movie or linger over a romantic dinner. Essentially, it is to argue.

On the recommendation of Mr. Stanley a few years ago, the couple started going out to breakfast every Saturday morning to discuss problems and issues. At first it felt a little weird. Once they settled into the routine, it proved enormously helpful. Before, discord could erupt at any moment and tempers would flare. Now, knowing they have a set time to discuss difficult issues is comforting and leaves them the rest of the week to relax, Mr. Lewis says. In fact, they rarely argue during the sessions anymore. They simply work through issues. "Now we really look forward to it," he says.

Douglas Kelley and Vince Waldron, professors at Arizona State University who are studying the importance of forgiveness in marriage, interviewed a couple married for about 50 years who had another oddly comforting routine for managing discord. After a fight, the man always left the house and spent a night at a local hotel.

The next morning he would always return. Then, the two would have breakfast and sort everything out.

happiness predetermined

Very interesting theory about this being pre-wired, but I gotta believe that I could be a smidge happier without the working stuff...

What brings us happiness?

There has been an explosion of research dedicated to the issue in the past decade. Some researchers now believe that our emotional buoyancy is genetically set within a range, which acts as an anchor to our enthusiasm in good times and as a balloon in bad.

One of the first studies into set ranges of happiness, by researchers at Northwestern University in 1978, showed that lottery winners and spinal-cord-injury victims both fall back to their original happiness ranges within a year of either event -- a raft of research since has backed their findings.

This creates a happiness paradox: We may imagine we couldn't survive the end of a marriage or death of a family member, yet our innate "psychological immune system" is well equipped to greet these disasters when they occur, says Daniel Gilbert, a researcher at the department of psychology at Harvard University. The flip side is that things we imagine will make us happy -- a new car, a new career or a new spouse -- may give some temporary elation, but eventually the exhilaration fades.

Within our set ranges, however, there is room to maneuver, says Gordon Parker, psychiatrist and executive director of Black Dog Institute, a Sydney-based facility for treating mood disorders.

Happier people, he says, tend to have a few key traits in common: they believe in causes larger than themselves; they are more optimistic; they don't look to material wealth for fulfillment; and they have many meaningful relationships. "They tend to be more resilient ... more flexible and more focused on the present and the future, not the past," says Dr. Parker.

Simply being in a job for the money doesn't deliver happiness. Research by Richard Easterlin, professor of economics at the University of Southern California, supports that: His 2003 study of 1,500 people in the U.S. over three decades found that as incomes increased, happiness didn't.


interesting pov

The Key to a Lasting
Marriage: Combat

Even Happy Couples
Aren't Really Compatible,
Suggests Latest Research

By HILARY STOUT
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
November 4, 2004; Page D1
A growing body of research suggests there is no such thing as a compatible couple.
This may come as no surprise to all those who have endured years of thermostat wars, objectionable spending habits and maddening tendencies at the wheel. But it flies smack in the face of Hollywood, Shakespeare, most people's core fantasies, and all those dating Web sites touting scientific screening to find a perfect match.

Years of relationship studies by some leading figures in the field make it increasingly clear that most couples, whether they're happy or unhappy, have a similar number of irreconcilable differences. What is more, all couples -- happy or not -- tend to argue about the same things. Top of the list, whether you are rich or poor, is money. Other common topics include household chores, work obligations, kids and differing priorities. Golf course or family outing? Vacation with the kids or without them?

"Compatibility is misunderstood and overrated," says Ted Huston, a professor of psychology and human ecology. Mr. Huston and his colleagues have been following 168 couples since they married as twentysomethings during the 1980s. They interviewed them two months after their wedding, then again 14 months, 26 months and 13 years later about two potential marriage minefields: leisure interests and the expectations about who should do what around the house.

After 13.5 years, 105 of the couples still were married and 56 were divorced. (The others were widowed or couldn't be located.) The researchers found that the couples who divorced "were not less similar" in either category.

This study and others like it also make clear that most disagreements that arise in a marriage -- 69% of them, according to work by John Gottman, a relationship researcher at the University of Washington -- are never resolved.

The result has been a gradual shift in marriage therapy toward helping spouses manage, accept, and even "honor" their discord, rather than trying to resolve the unresolvable. One national couples-counseling program suggests spouses schedule a regular weekly date to argue. Others now offer instruction in fighting. Some encourage couples to single out problems that can be dealt with and accept that most (like how tidy the house should be) will never be resolved.

"If I were to characterize the way programs have changed in last half-decade that would be the major thing," Mr. Huston says.

Of course some conflicts do matter deeply -- she wants children, he doesn't, to name a big one; alcoholism and infidelity, to name a couple more. Differing religions and cultural attitudes also are problematic, especially after the couple has children, says Scott Stanley, co-director of the Center for Marital and Family Studies at the University of Denver. He and co-director Howard Markman have done extensive studies tracking couples from courtship through years of marriage.

But the bottom line, Mr. Markman says, is that "virtually all couples, happy and unhappy, are going to argue, particularly in the early stages" of marriage. "What tends to predict the future of a relationship is not what you argue about, but when you do argue, how you handle your negative emotions."

Growing consensus around that notion has led some in the profession to develop rules of engagement that can make arguing less destructive:

Don't escalate an argument by blurting out sweeping generalizations: "You always..." Stay on the specific subject. Don't drag past events, behavior and lingering grudges into the discussion.

Try not to interrupt -- let your spouse finish making a point before you jump in.
Take a little time to cool down after a heated argument. But within an hour, Mr. Gottman recommends having a "reconciliatory conversation," which will should result in a more level-headed, productive discussion.

Researchers at Mr. Gottman's Relationship Research Laboratory (known informally to people in the field as the "love lab") videotaped couples arguing and monitored their heart rates. When the heart rates rose above 100, the researchers interrupted and said (falsely) that their equipment was malfunctioning. They asked couples to stop and read a magazine until it was fixed. Once both people's heart rates had dropped down to normal range -- after about a half-hour -- the researchers announced the equipment was fixed and the couples started up their disagreement again.

The change after the interlude was marked. "It was like it was a different relationship," Mr. Gottman says. Everyone was "much more rational and creative."

While airing differences is important, make sure to set aside some time where discussing areas of discord is off-limits, Mr. Stanley and Mr. Markman say. A walk by the river on a beautiful autumn day isn't the time to bring up problems; it is a time to enjoy each other and remember what attracted you to each other in the first place.

Instead -- and this may seem weird -- set aside a time to talk about the things that are bothering you. Like many married couples, Jim and Kathryn Lewis have a Saturday "date" built into their weekly schedules. The purpose isn't to catch a movie or linger over a romantic dinner. Essentially, it is to argue.

On the recommendation of Mr. Stanley a few years ago, the couple started going out to breakfast every Saturday morning to discuss problems and issues. At first it felt a little weird. Once they settled into the routine, it proved enormously helpful. Before, discord could erupt at any moment and tempers would flare. Now, knowing they have a set time to discuss difficult issues is comforting and leaves them the rest of the week to relax, Mr. Lewis says. In fact, they rarely argue during the sessions anymore. They simply work through issues. "Now we really look forward to it," he says.

Douglas Kelley and Vince Waldron, professors at Arizona State University who are studying the importance of forgiveness in marriage, interviewed a couple married for about 50 years who had another oddly comforting routine for managing discord. After a fight, the man always left the house and spent a night at a local hotel.

The next morning he would always return. Then, the two would have breakfast and sort everything out.